維摩經略疏垂裕記 6.138

6.138

三、「若」下，顯理功能。「若能」等者，荊溪云：復滅心宗顯懺功著。「見理」者，見無生理也。「事性」等者，事謂違無作罪，性即性罪，根本即根本妄惑罪，此之三罪是前三懺所破。故荊溪云：事即事懺，性即觀相，根本即是無生懺也。罪心是心，即罪根本，能達心者根本永忘。又見理者，貪等無生，此則以理破於心執，故此心執通能障於三種懺也。三種懺內無生為首，無生生執罪尚不滅，況於前二而生執耶？

Third, from "If" onward, revealing the function of the principle. Regarding "If one can" and so forth, Jingxi says: "Again, extinguishing the core of the mind reveals the eminent efficacy of repentance." "Seeing the principle" refers to seeing the principle of the unproduced. Regarding "phenomenal nature" and so forth: 'phenomenal' refers to the transgressions of violating unmanifest [restraint]; 'nature' refers to natural transgressions [per se]; 'fundamental' refers to transgressions of fundamental delusive afflictions. These three transgressions are what were broken by the preceding three repentances. Therefore, Jingxi says: "Phenomenal corresponds to the phenomenal repentance, nature corresponds to contemplating the signs, and fundamental corresponds to the repentance of the unproduced." The mind of transgression is the mind; this is the root of transgression. One who can penetrate this mind will forever forget the root. Furthermore, 'seeing the principle' means that greed and the rest are unproduced; this breaks the mind's graspings by means of principle. Thus, these graspings of the mind universally obstruct the three kinds of repentance. Among the three kinds of repentance, the unproduced is foremost. If grasping arises within the unproduced, transgressions are not even extinguished, so how could grasping arise in the first two?