維摩經略疏垂裕記 6.145
維摩經略疏垂裕記 6.145
- Language
- Classical Chinese
6.145
六、入真分判斷除,二:初、懸敘分科,二:初、懸敘三假,二:初、列三名。二、簡體析,二:初、正簡。荊溪云:假相者,假文具三,皆用幻等。「亦入圓真」者,既是體法能至圓中,以通屬,故云亦也。所以三釋之中前之二釋雖亦衍門,不及第三唯觀心性,故前兩釋多寄通真。「折假」者,三假之義既在《成論》,三藏豈無?但諸《阿含》名多不顯,所以三假之盛在弘教者,故廣在於《成論》。文中言折假者,非無其理。何者?如云因無常故緣亦無常,前念後念悉皆生滅,長不住故短亦不住。既俱無常,即破常倒,不假更用自他等名,故四句推唯在衍教,便令成於生即無生,故用衍門以破藏拙。「隨情」者,假非即理,故得情名。理即是空,順空隨理。二、「此即」下,結顯。
Sixth, entering the truth, distinguishing, and severing, in two parts: first, preliminary layout and sectional division, in two parts: first, preliminary layout of the three provisionalities, in two parts: first, listing the three names; second, selecting substance and analysis, in two parts: first, direct selection. Jingxi says: "Regarding the marks of the provisional: the text on provisionality contains three, all using illusion and the like." Regarding "Also enters the perfect truth": since it embodies phenomena and can reach the perfect middle, being classified under the common [teaching], it therefore says 'also'. Hence among the three interpretations, although the former two interpretations are also Mahāyāna gates, they do not equal the third of solely contemplating mind-nature; thus the former two interpretations are mostly lodged in the common truth. Regarding "analyzing provisionality": since the doctrine of the three provisionalities is found in the Tattvasiddhi-śāstra, how could the Tripiṭaka lack it? However, the names are mostly not evident in the various Āgamas; the prominence of the three provisionalities lies in those who propagate the teaching, and so it is elaborated in the Tattvasiddhi-śāstra. When the text speaks of analyzing provisionality, it is not without its principle. Why? As it is said, because causes are impermanent, conditions are also impermanent; former thoughts and latter thoughts are all arising and ceasing; because the long does not abide, the short also does not abide. Since both are impermanent, they break the upside-down view of permanence, without needing to further employ names like self and other; therefore, investigation by the four clauses exists only in the Mahāyāna teaching, immediately causing one to realize that arising is precisely non-arising; hence the Mahāyāna gate is used to break the clumsiness of the Tripiṭaka. Regarding "according with sentiment": because the provisional is not identical to principle, it acquires the name 'sentiment'. Principle is emptiness; according with emptiness accords with principle. Second, from "This then" onward, concluding exposition.
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation