維摩經略疏垂裕記 9.136

9.136

二、「此未」下，結異顯同。三、結斥。四、明不思議法門轉變自在，二：初、敘意分科。「阿鞞跋致」，此云不退也。「轉不轉義」者，即是退轉不退轉也。「佛言」下，荊溪云：佛答意者，前之二教不轉，方得名為不退。後之二教以得理故，從理為名。理性本無轉與不轉。轉者，退義，故不退也，故云皆名跋致。

Second, from "this unprecedented..." downward, concluding the differences to reveal the identity. Third, concluding reproach. Fourth, explaining that the inconceivable Dharma gate is sovereign in transformation, which has two parts: first, recounting the purport and dividing the sections. Avaivartika is translated here as "non-retrogression." Regarding "the meaning of turning and not turning": this is precisely retrogression and non-retrogression. Regarding "the Buddha said..." downward: Jingxi says that the intention of the Buddha's answer is that only when the former two teachings do not turn can they be called non-retrogression. Because the latter two teachings attain the principle, they take their name from the principle. The nature of principle fundamentally has neither turning nor not turning. "Turning" has the sense of retrogression; hence it does not retrogress, which is why it is said they are all called vaivartika.