楞伽阿跋多羅寶經註解 2.175

2.175

佛答非我說有相違所以下，徵釋。生無生者，言我了於生即是無生，唯是自心之所現故。若有若無一切外法，其性本無有生，故我說無生。此總答也。別答中有二：一、為壞外道因生，如彼計種種異因有生故，說一切性無生；二、為破外道計有無生，非自執著妄想為緣。又告大慧云「我非有無」者，謂離有無之見故，我以無生之說而說無生也。

The Buddha answered that his teaching does not have a contradiction. From "why is that?" downward, he investigates and explains. "Arising is non-arising" means: I understand that arising is precisely non-arising, because it is only the appearance of one's own mind. Whether existent or non-existent, all external dharmas originally have no arising in their nature; therefore I say they are unproduced. This is the general answer. In the particular answer there are two points: first, to destroy the tīrthikas' arising from causes, as they posit various distinct causes for having arising, he says all natures are unproduced; second, to refute the tīrthikas' positing of an arising of existence and nonexistence that does not have one's own clinging vikalpa as its condition. Furthermore, he tells Mahāmati, "for me, there is no existence or nonexistence," meaning that because he is free from views of existence and nonexistence, he speaks of non-arising through the discourse on non-arising.