楞伽阿跋多羅寶經註解 3.168

3.168

上云智慧不得，固以釋之，恐學者未了，又申數問意，令破妄智而顯真智故，一一挾妄反覆為難。初云為不覺性自共相等，謂陰、界、入等諸法都不覺知有自共相異不異，故云「智不得耶？」又云「為自共相種種諸法自性相之所隱蔽，不得為智耶？」如下諸難，則智不為智，文顯不釋。

Above, it was said that "wisdom does not apprehend," which was indeed already explained; yet fearing that learners might not have fully understood, he again presented several questions with the intention of crushing false wisdom and revealing true wisdom, thus raising objections one by one based on delusions. First, when he says, "because it does not perceive whether the nature of svalakṣaṇa and sāmānyalakṣaṇa are different or not different," this means that with respect to all dharmas such as the skandhas, dhātus, and āyatanas, one does not perceive whether their svalakṣaṇa and sāmānyalakṣaṇa are different or not different; hence he asks: "Is wisdom unapprehending?" Again, he says: "Or is it not considered wisdom because it is obscured by the intrinsic marks of the nature of the diverse dharmas of svalakṣaṇa and sāmānyalakṣaṇa?" In the various objections that follow, wisdom would not be wisdom; the text is clear and needs no explanation.