大毘盧遮那成佛經疏 2.7

2.7

經云「遍嚴」者，謂計此神我能造諸法。然世間尊勝遍嚴之事是我所為，與自在天計小異。如論中破自在云「自在天何故。不盡作樂人，盡作苦人？而有苦者樂者，當知從愛憎生，故不自在。」今遍嚴者既能造諸福樂，而不能以樂遮苦，何名遍常自在耶？

The sūtra says: “Pervasively adorned.” This refers to imputing that this spiritual self is able to produce all dharmas. Yet the noble and pervasively adorned affairs of the world are what I do; this differs slightly from the imputation of Īśvara. As the treatise refutes Īśvara, saying: “Why does Īśvara not make everyone happy, or make everyone suffer? Since there are those who suffer and those who are happy, one must know this arises from attachment and aversion, hence he is not autonomous.” Now, since the pervasively adorned one can produce all blessings and joy, yet cannot ward off suffering with joy, how can he be called pervasively eternal and autonomous?