四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.170

2.170

奪衣戒二十五。五緣：一是大比丘，甄下眾非行類故。二本規同行。三者不定與，前人決定取，多生惱故。四句中二句，初受與俱決定，二決定與而受者不定，奪取重犯；若與受俱不定者，吉。四瞋奪。五得屬己。《四分》不犯者：不瞋恚，言我悔、不與汝衣、還我衣來；若彼知悔即還；若餘人語便還；若借他衣著，他著無道理，還奪取，不犯；若恐失恐壞；若彼人破見、戒、威儀；若被舉、滅擯、應滅擯；若為此事故有命梵難，一切奪舉不藏者。

Precept twenty-five: Snatching away a robe. Five conditions: first, being a fully ordained bhikṣu, distinguished because lower assemblies are not of the same category of conduct. Second, originally intending to give it to a fellow practitioner. Third, not giving it definitely, while the other party takes it definitely, which mostly causes distress. Among the four permutations, in two permutations—first, both giving and receiving are definite; second, giving is definite while receiving is indefinite—snatching it back incurs a heavy offense; if both giving and receiving are indefinite, it is a duṣkṛta. Fourth, snatching it in anger. Fifth, obtaining it so that it belongs to oneself. Dharmaguptaka Vinaya allowances: not being angry and saying 'I regret it, I will not give you the robe, give me my robe back'; if the other party knows of the regret and returns it immediately; if returned upon another person's word; if borrowing another's robe to wear and he wears it improperly, snatching it back is not an offense; if fearing loss or damage; if that person violates right view, precepts, or īryāpatha; if suspended, expelled, or deserving expulsion; or if because of this matter there is a danger to life or brahmacarya; in all such cases, snatching and holding it without concealing it [is not an offense].