四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.174

2.174

有難蘭若離衣戒二十九。六緣：一是受持三衣，二冬分非時，三有疑怖處，四置衣在村，五無因緣，六過七夜犯。《四分》：疑者，畏有賊盜。《十誦》：疑失一水器；怖畏者，乃至惡比丘畏。言村內者，《僧祇》：寄著可疑俗人家（以不良家，知此比丘無衣隨身）。《五分》：上二衣中，隨所重者，聽寄一衣；不得寄下衣，以隨身故。禮拜入寺乞食，不得單著，但得寄一衣。明兩緣者，《僧祇》：夏三月在蘭若恐怖處，開置一衣村內，不作日限。《五分》：夏中不許離衣，要待後安居竟；賊難恐怖因緣，得寄白衣家；不作日限，唯須十日一度往看，恐有濕爛蟲齧等過。《善見》：蘭若處僧坊堅密，不須寄衣，無者得寄，六夜一看；見衣已，還蘭若所。上來諸部，恐有急難賊怖，則開寄衣，不作日限；必有他緣，方制六夜。《四分》初緣，因蘭若賊劫，佛令置一一衣村內，不制日限。後因聚落比丘起過，更開緣至六夜。而不顯緣相，致令古師妄執。今準諸部明文，有緣皆開。《五分》有恐怖者不限多日如上，更開塔僧事、和尚闍梨事、及他事，皆聽六夜留一一衣白衣處。《明了論》中：蘭若比丘夏安居中，須往餘處聽法，不可恒將三衣，聽留寄餘處，六宿不失；至第七日還取衣；過第七夜已，如前寄之；事若未竟，中間恒許。律不犯中：已寄六宿，至第七夜明相未出前；若到衣所，若手捉衣（謂蘭若俗人家女人處，必捉衣），若至擲石所及處，若捨衣。餘同聚落離衣戒。

Precept 29: Leaving the robes behind in a perilous wilderness dwelling. There are six conditions: (1) one formally possesses the three robes; (2) it is in the winter portion, an off-season time; (3) it is a place of suspicion and fear; (4) one deposits the robes in a village; (5) there is no special circumstance; (6) exceeding seven nights constitutes the offense. The Dharmaguptaka Vinaya states: 'Suspicion means fearing there are thieves and robbers.' The Daśādhyāya-vinaya states: 'Suspecting the loss of even a single water pot; fear extends to the fear of evil monks.' As for 'inside a village,' the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya states: 'Depositing them with a suspicious lay family (because an improper family will know this monk has no robes on his person).' The Pañcavargika-vinaya states: 'Of the upper two robes, one is allowed to deposit one robe, whichever is heavier; one must not deposit the lower robe, because it stays on one's body. When making obeisance, entering the monastery, or begging for food, one must not wear a single robe, so one may deposit only one robe.' As for explaining the two circumstances, the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya states: 'During the three months of the summer, in a wilderness dwelling that is a fearful place, one is permitted to deposit one robe inside a village without setting a day limit.' The Pañcavargika-vinaya states: 'During the summer, one is not permitted to be separated from the robes, and must wait until the later varṣā concludes; due to the cause of danger from thieves and fearful circumstances, one may deposit it at a layperson's house without setting a day limit, only needing to go inspect it once every ten days, fearing faults such as dampness, rotting, insect bites, and the like.' The Samantapāsādikā states: 'If the monastic quarters in the wilderness dwelling are secure and sealed, one need not deposit the robes; if not, one may deposit them and inspect them once every six nights; having seen the robes, one returns to the wilderness dwelling.' From the various schools mentioned above, if there is an emergency or fear of thieves, depositing robes is permitted without a day limit; only if there are other circumstances is the limit of six nights instituted. In the Dharmaguptaka Vinaya, the initial circumstance arose because of robbers plundering wilderness dwellings, so the Buddha had them deposit one robe in a village without instituting a day limit. Later, because village monks committed faults, another allowance was made extending up to six nights, but without clarifying the conditions, which led ancient masters to cling mistakenly [to strict limits]. Now, based on the clear texts of the various schools, whenever there are valid circumstances, allowances are made. In the Pañcavargika-vinaya, where there is terror, it is not limited to a number of days as stated above; allowances are also made for affairs of the stūpa or the saṃgha, affairs of the upādhyāya or ācārya, and other matters, for all of which one is permitted to leave one robe at a layperson's place for six nights. In the Vinayavibhāṣā: 'If a wilderness monk during the summer varṣā must go elsewhere to listen to the Dharma, he cannot constantly take the three robes with him; he is permitted to leave and deposit them elsewhere, and they are not lost for six nights; on the seventh day he returns to retrieve the robes; after the seventh night has passed, he deposits them as before; if the business is not yet finished, this is permitted continuously throughout.' Among non-offenses in the Vinaya: having deposited them for six nights, before the light of dawn appears on the seventh night; if one reaches the place of the robes, or touches the robes with one's hand (meaning, in the wilderness dwelling at a laywoman's place, one must touch the robes), or reaches the distance of a stone's throw, or relinquishes the robes. The rest is the same as the precept on being separated from one's robes in a village.