四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.184

2.184

向非具人說麁罪戒七。《多論》：寧破塔壞像，不說他麁罪，則破法身。不問前比丘有罪無罪，皆墮。七緣：一是比丘及尼，二犯初二篇罪，三知犯，四無僧法開，五向未受具說，六言詞了，七前人聞知。《五分》：尼向白衣說僧汎爾小小罪過，皆墮。《僧祇》：若人問言，某甲比丘犯淫飲酒者？答云：彼自當知。若已作法，人問者，倒問彼言：何處聞？答云：某處聞。比丘云：亦某處聞。因俗女來寺，六群示之，此人犯僧殘。俗女說偈云：出家已經久，宜應修梵行；童子戲不止，云何受人施。《十誦》云：有訶云，佛法中乃有是癡人。應答云：我家廣大，種種皆有。律云：若說上二篇，犯墮；下諸篇及自說己罪，若說下三眾罪，一切吉羅。又有五事：若說名字、若種姓、若衣服、若房舍、若相貌，皆墮。不犯者：若不知，若麁惡不麁惡想，若白衣先已聞麁罪者，一切開。

Precept seven: Speaking of gross offenses to an unordained person. The Sarvāstivāda-vinaya-vibhāṣā states: "One would rather destroy a stūpa and break an image than speak of another's gross offenses, for that would destroy the Dharma-body." Regardless of whether the other monk is guilty or not guilty, in either case it is a pāyattika. Seven conditions constitute [the offense]: first, it concerns a bhikṣu or bhikṣuṇī; second, they have committed an offense of the first two classes [pārājika or saṃghāvaśeṣa]; third, one knows of the transgression; fourth, there is no allowance by the saṃgha's formal procedure; fifth, one speaks of it to an unordained person; sixth, the words are distinct; seventh, the other person hears and understands. The Pañcavargika-vinaya states: "If a bhikṣuṇī speaks to a layperson of any ordinary minor fault of the saṃgha, in every case it is a pāyattika." The Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya states: "If someone asks, 'Has such-and-such bhikṣu committed sexual misconduct or drunk alcohol?', one should answer: 'He should know for himself.' If a formal procedure has already been performed and someone asks, one should turn the question back on them, saying: 'Where did you hear that?' If they answer, 'I heard it at such a place,' the monk should say, 'I also heard it at such a place.'" When a laywoman came to the monastery, the group of six pointed out to her: "This person has committed a saṃghāvaśeṣa." The laywoman spoke a verse: / "Having gone forth long ago, / you ought to cultivate pure conduct; / if boyish play does not cease, / how can you receive people's donations?" / The Daśādhyāya-vinaya states: "If someone scolds, 'How could there be such a foolish person in the Buddha-Dharma?', one should reply: 'Our family is vast and has all kinds [of people].'" The Vinaya states: "If one speaks of the upper two classes, it is a pāyattika; if one speaks of the lower classes, or speaks of one's own offenses, or speaks of offenses of the lower three assemblies, in all cases it is a duṣkṛta." Furthermore, there are five matters: whether one mentions the name, clan, clothing, dwelling, or physical appearance, it is in every case a pāyattika. Non-offenses: if one did not know; if one perceives what is gross and evil as not gross and evil; or if the layperson had already heard of the gross offense beforehand—in all such cases there is an allowance.