四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.440

2.440

若犯不犯，二境相對，不處分、盜等是也。盜戒即四（有主無主想故）；不處分具五（不處分處分想）。五謂轉想，有前心蘭故；四約本迷，二境全無罪故。以此義五。若犯不犯，或四或五。

If it is an opposition between two objects of transgression and non-transgression, not designating, theft, and the like are examples. The precept against theft has four (because of thinking owned [items] are unowned); not designating possesses all five (not designating, thinking it is designated). Five refers to shifting ideation, because of the thullaccaya of the preceding mind; four concerns original bewilderment, because across both objects there is entirely no offense. By this meaning there are five. When it is transgression versus non-transgression, there are either four or five.