四分律行事鈔資持記 1.1213

1.1213

次科，初徵。二釋，為三，初點本宗。但令差人，及羯磨中，唯牒一名，故云不了。次示三律並差二人。注釋多人，謂二對三對；作法差已，隨對起復，互相替換；始終二人，非謂齊作。後引三千，正明所以。僧自恣竟者，即同《十誦》，下不用之。此中但取差二之意。

In the next heading, first, an inquiry. Second, the explanation, in three parts: first, pointing out our own school. Since it only orders the appointment of persons, and in the karmavācanā only one name is pronounced, it is said to be unclear. Next, showing that three Vinayas all appoint two persons. The commentary's explanation of 'multiple persons' refers to two pairs or three pairs; having performed the ritual and appointed them, following each pair they rise and return, alternating with one another; throughout, there are two persons, not meaning that they act simultaneously. Afterward, citing the *Three Thousand [Rules]* directly explains the reason. 'When the Saṃgha's pravāraṇā is finished' is the same as the *Daśādhyāya-vinaya*, and is not used below. Here, only the intention of appointing two is taken.