四分律行事鈔資持記 1.315

1.315

次科。上二人可知。後人心不集者，此謂有可訶事，心不同忍。必無訶事，則同初人。故下，引證，初即〈瞻波〉文。彼明非法和合羯磨云：有同一住處同一和合一處羯磨，應與欲者與欲，現前應得訶者不訶，作白二乃作白四，白此事乃為彼事。此文可證相順心違。又下，即〈雜法〉中文，初引身子懷疑問佛。上如法字寫誤，彼正作非法。應下，是佛所斷。彼云佛言聽默然，即具出十五種默，如〈羯磨篇〉引。

In the next section: the first two persons are understandable. As for the latter person whose mind does not assemble, this means there is a matter that could be protested, and his mind does not agree to endure it. If there is definitely no matter to protest, he is the same as the first person. The passage below cites proof, the first being the text from the 'Campā Khandhaka'. In explaining a non-Dharmic yet harmonious karmavācanā, it states: 'There are those who in the same dwelling place, in the same harmony, perform a karmavācanā in one place; those who should grant chanda grant chanda, those present who may protest do not protest, but when doing a jñaptidvitīyā karmavācanā they perform a jñapticatustha karmavācanā, or when announcing this matter they act on that matter.' This text can prove outward compliance with inward opposition. The passage below is from the 'Miscellaneous Matters' chapter: it first cites Śāriputra harboring doubt and asking the Buddha. The word 'in accordance with Dharma' above is a copyist's error; that text properly reads 'not in accordance with Dharma'. The passage beginning 'Should...' is the Buddha's determination. That text states that the Buddha said he permits remaining silent, and it fully lists the fifteen kinds of silence, as cited in the 'Karmavācanā' chapter.