四分律行事鈔資持記 1.320

1.320

次成否中，即明別眾成不成相。正簡中，初科，上二句明成。別犯下諸篇，不壞本故。別犯下，明不成。根本已壞，眾法絕故。文又為二，初約不知明成法。引律無作有想，以例穢作淨想，理無差故。羯磨成者，佛判法成；即彰非別。罪即吉羅。心不同者，出結罪意。審下，二約眾知明隨別。

Next, in [the section on] validity or invalidity, it explains the characteristics of whether a separate assembly is constituted or not. In the primary differentiation, in the first section, the upper two phrases explain validity: committing offenses of the lower chapters does not destroy the root. The phrase beginning 'Committing offenses separately...' explains invalidity: the root is already destroyed, so saṃgha rites are severed. The text is further divided into two parts: first, explaining the validity of the rite based on lack of knowledge. It cites from the Vinaya the case of thinking there is an act when there is none, to draw an analogy to thinking the defiled is pure, for in principle there is no discrepancy. When it says 'the karmavācanā is valid', the Buddha has determined that the rite is valid; this makes clear that it is not a separate assembly. The offense is a duṣkṛta. 'Their minds did not agree' brings out the intention behind establishing the offense. The phrase beginning 'If carefully...' is the second part, explaining that according to whether the assembly knows, it becomes a separate assembly accordingly.