四分律行事鈔資持記 1.321

1.321

雜類中，初列人相。三狂，總亂心病壞也。須簡下品及中品未得法者。或下，明非別所以。上句對十三難。次句對三舉。形差對尼等。沙彌，法未滿；文略此句，疏則具之。病報對三狂瘂聾。緣下一句，通括上四。開謂許別也。凡下，總判。言未論者，未猶不也。足謂足數，別即別眾。由上諸人，二中不攝。此中本明非別，然與非足人相不殊，故兼示之。（若云足別人者，此說別眾。安得專明足數！又前引捨戒受欲自言等，並準對首，豈是未論。）

In miscellaneous categories, the characteristics of the persons are first listed. The 'three types of madness' generally refers to mental disturbance, illness, and derangement. One must exclude those of the lowest grade and those of the intermediate grade who have not attained the Dharma. The passage beginning 'Or...' explains the reason why they are not a separate assembly. The upper phrase corresponds to the thirteen unordainable conditions. The next phrase corresponds to the three suspensions. 'Physical difference' corresponds to nuns and the like. 'Śrāmaṇeras' have not completed the Dharma; the text omits this phrase, but the Commentary provides it fully. 'Illness and karmic retribution' corresponds to the three types of madness, the mute, and the deaf. The phrase beginning 'Conditions...' encompasses the above four. 'Allowed' means that separation is permitted. The passage beginning 'In general...' gives a comprehensive judgment. The phrase 'not yet discussed' uses 'not yet' in the sense of 'not'. 'Making up' refers to making up the quorum; 'separate' refers to a separate assembly. Because the various persons above are not included in the two categories, and this section originally explains non-separation, yet their personal marks do not differ from those who do not make up the quorum, they are also shown here. (If one says they are persons who make up the quorum or are separate, this discusses separate assemblies; how could it exclusively explain making up the quorum! Furthermore, the earlier citations regarding relinquishing precepts, receiving chanda, speaking of one's own accord, and so on, are all modeled on face-to-face rites; how could they be unaddressed?)