四分律行事鈔資持記 1.358

1.358

取舍中，初科為二，初至皆成來，一往暫許。據文有二。一據忘名，律中若不憶姓相，但云眾多比丘與欲清淨；次準不說，並如後引。若下，二取義奪破。律中等者，釋上文意。忘誤得罪，對上兩文。無緣不得，顯非常開。上來釋通本部。約下，勸準他宗。文見次科。

In adopting and rejecting: The first section has two parts. First, up to 'all are valid,' it provisionally permits it for the moment. According to the text, there are two points: one is based on forgetting names—in the Vinaya, if one does not remember the clan name and appearance, one simply says 'multiple bhikṣus confer chanda and pariśuddhi'; next, it is modeled on not speaking, both as cited below. From 'If...' onward, second, it takes the meaning to refute and overturn it. 'In the Vinaya...' and so forth explains the meaning of the above text. Incurring an offense for forgetting or erring corresponds to the two passages above. Not being permitted without a circumstance reveals that this is not a regular exception. The above has explained and harmonized our own school. From 'Restricting...' onward advises conforming to other schools. The text appears in the next section.