四分律行事鈔資持記 1.431

1.431

二三人中三，初明當法，上二句總標。若下，別釋。初明開法。滿四不成者，且約多分。自恣則成。若作下，次示本位，初正示。必下，料簡問邊，初明懺提須問。但約必與不必，以分三十九十，此猶循昔；若準疏意，捨墮落前眾法對中；九十單對，不必須問；中蘭定問，兩人不成。若持下，簡餘法不須。若是下，簡非分。必下，勸依。

Under 'two or three persons', there are three parts: first, elucidating the proper procedure, where the upper two lines state the general heading. From 'If' downward explains in detail. First, it explains exceptional procedures: that reaching four is invalid applies for the most part; pravāraṇā, however, is valid. From 'If performing' downward next shows the original station, first showing it directly. From 'Must' downward differentiates interrogating the [other] party, first explaining that repenting a pāyattika requires interrogation. Merely distinguishing between the thirty [naiḥsargika-pāyattikas] and ninety [śuddha-pāyattikas] on the basis of whether interrogation is mandatory or not mandatory still follows the old [commentaries]; if one follows the intention of the Commentary, forfeiture falls before the face-to-face saṃgha procedures; the ninety are purely face-to-face and do not necessarily require interrogation; intermediate thullaccayas definitely require interrogation, and two persons are invalid. From 'If maintaining' downward rules out that other procedures do not require it. From 'If it is' downward distinguishes what is not within their purview. From 'Must' downward urges adherence.