四分律行事鈔資持記 1.775

1.775

義決中，初正決。上言自著不障，不約知與不知，故須兩判。但下，遮濫。恐謂前境淨穢，亦同形服約知不知，故特簡之。下文指廣。《義鈔》第一，《業疏》第三。《疏》云：有師言但是具戒，何論淨穢；陵辱慢重，故障出家；乃至祖師云：宜用《僧祇》明判淨穢是也。

In determining the principles: First, the formal determination. Above, it said that wearing them oneself does not impede, without specifying knowing or not knowing, hence it requires a dual determination. Under 'Only...', he dispels confusion. Fearing people might think the purity or impurity of the objective sphere is also like physical appearance and robes depending on knowing or not knowing, he specifically distinguishes it. The text below points to the extensive explanations: the first fascicle of the Conceptual Manual, and the third of the Karma Commentary. The Commentary says: 'A master said: as long as she possesses the full precepts, why discuss purity or impurity? Insult and dishonor are grave, which naturally impedes going forth'; up to the Patriarchal Master saying: 'One should use the Mahāsāṃghika to clearly determine purity and impurity', which is this very thing.