四分律行事鈔資持記 1.776

1.776

壞比丘中。答文，初句判定。尼下，例決。彼問云：汝不犯淨行比丘耶。言事希者，出僧中略意。故下，引文決。彼具問云：汝不盜現前僧物不？於六親所、比丘比丘尼所，行不淨行不？父母師長有病棄去不？不殺發菩提心眾生不？

Under "corrupting a bhikṣu": In the text of the reply, the first sentence makes the definitive determination. From "nuns" onward, he decides by analogy. That text asks: "Have you not violated a bhikṣu of pure conduct?" The statement that "such an occurrence is rare" explains the reason for its omission within the Saṃgha. From "Therefore" onward, he cites texts to decide it. That text fully asks: "Did you not steal property of the Saṃgha present? Did you not perform impure conduct toward the six classes of relatives, bhikṣus, or bhikṣuṇīs? When parents, teachers, and elders were ill, did you abandon them and leave? Did you not kill sentient beings who had brought forth the mind of awakening (bodhicitta)?"