四分律行事鈔資持記 1.81

1.81

舉例中，初明本圓不取，示有所宗。如重輕篇聚、眾法羯磨、受懺治擯、結說安恣等，用人用法，多出本宗。又下標云部別不同，不取外部，皆此意也。餘下，二列示四例。初不了有二。一不明了，如十五種略說戒，及東方有山稱山之類。二不了足，如四人法不除懺捨等。下文一一別標，用此二意尋之可見。二廢前者。如歌聲說戒，鈔云此是《五分》廢教。（如試外道、魚肉正食，雖同廢教，至下六師方可言之。此中且據諸律，古記一混，學者須知。）三有義無文者。如顛狂人前捨戒不成，是有不足之義，故引《十誦》等證之。（如定由旬，準律十四說戒，十三先往，準強百里，遂用《智論》下品為定。又十三難不問壞比丘，準尼受反問，引《善生》明文。此皆屬後六師中。）四無文有事。如云三衣應受持，及非時殘宿不受皆明三藥加法，而無受文。或云結界集僧，無自然六相文等。如下，結示。

In the section "Presenting Examples": First, explaining that what is complete in the root is not taken [from elsewhere] shows that there is a tradition followed. Such as the heavy and light divisions and clusters, the karmans of the saṃgha, ordination, deśanā, disciplinary suspension, boundary establishment, poṣadha, varṣā, and pravāraṇā—the persons employed and the methods used mostly stem from our own school. Furthermore, below it notes that different divisions are not identical and one does not take from other branches; all of this has this meaning. Under "The rest...": Second, it lists and shows four examples. First, "incomplete" has two types: 1. Unclear, such as the fifteen kinds of abbreviated poṣadha and declaring a mountain in the east when there is a mountain, and the like. 2. Insufficient, such as a four-person karman not removing deśanā, forfeiture, and so forth. The text below marks each separately; examining them with these two meanings, this can be seen. Second, "those superseding the earlier": such as reciting the precepts in song; the Manual says this is a superseded teaching of the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya. (Such as testing non-Buddhists, or fish and meat as principal food; although they are similarly superseded teachings, they can only be discussed when arriving at the six masters below. Here it is provisionally based on the various Vinayas; the ancient records conflated them, which scholars must recognize.) Third, "having principle but lacking text": such as relinquishing precepts in front of a madman being invalid; this has an insufficient sense, hence he cites the Daśādhyāya-vinaya and others to corroborate it. (Such as determining the yojana: based on the Vinaya's reciting the precepts on the fourteenth and arriving in advance on the thirteenth, based on a strenuous hundred li, he thereupon used the lowest grade from the Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa as definitive. Also, the thirteen impediments not inquiring about a corrupt bhikṣu: based on the reverse inquiry in bhikṣuṇī ordination, he cites the explicit text of the Upāsakaśīla-sūtra. All these belong to the six masters below.) Fourth, "lacking text but having transactions": such as stating that the three robes ought to be received and held, and the untimed, leftover, and overnight not being received all clarifying the procedure for adding the three medicines, yet lacking the text for receiving. Or stating that in establishing boundaries and gathering the saṃgha, there is no text for the six natural marks, and so forth. "As below": concludes and demonstrates.