四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1117

2.1117

《僧祇》八中，上四通約四儀，與前無異；下四別就坐相以明離處，由坐通地物不犯故。且下，舉床示相；餘船乘例同。初約動身明犯。若正下，次約擡舁明犯。問：倒地等緣，既非故作，何得結犯？答：此有法開，自可作法；故違而食，不復重開。彼云：在船上船築岸觸木石迴波，身離本處；若在乘上乘上坂下坂（坂謂大坡，不平故有上下。），若翻身離本處等。

In the general explanation, the Vinaya text is divided into three parts: first, displaying the terminology; next, listing five conditions: first, distinguishing the substance of the food; second, having previously accepted it; third, explaining whether the quantity of the food object constitutes a refusal or not, as shown in the note; fourth, concerning the instructional prohibition; fifth, based on the two conditions of the principal offense, which appear identical yet differ. From 'Sufficient' on, the third clarifies the assessment of the offense.