四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1118

2.1118

《五分》中。第四不益者，顯境足也。注中，初出異計。彼謂足食飽足方犯；但少一口，即不名足。此下，責非法。今準《五分》不受益緣，明取境足，誠有據矣。餘四可解。國下明別開。以[麩-夫+少]是正食，隨方所宜故。

In the Mahāsāṃghika's eight [conditions], the first four generally relate to the four postures, which do not differ from the above; the lower four specifically concern the sitting posture to clarify departing from the place, because sitting while touching ground-objects is not an offense. From 'And' on, it cites a bed to show the marks; the others, such as boats and mounts, are analogous. First, it clarifies the offense in terms of moving the body. From 'If properly' on, next it clarifies the offense in terms of being carried. Question: 'Since conditions such as falling to the ground are not done intentionally, how can an offense be assessed?' Answer: 'Here there is a legal exception, and one can naturally perform the rite; therefore, eating in violation of it does not allow for a repeated exception.' That text states: 'When on a boat, the boat strikes the bank, touches trees or rocks, or is turned by waves, causing one's body to leave its original place; or when on a mount, the mount ascends or descends a slope (a *bǎn* refers to a large slope, having ascents and descents because it is uneven), or if one turns the body and leaves the original place, and so forth.'