四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1243

2.1243

次科，初引律。境想事同婬戒。注中初句示律文，次句明今釋。謂先有方便欲飲，至後飲時，乃生非酒想疑；後心無犯，成前方便，故須結重。必先無意迷忘須開。疏云：諸師約心從境制，余意不同；聖制有以，文少不了；豈有智人由來不嗅，須漿誤飲，可結提耶！《十誦》。彼約不看，同今取境。看則非意，可證迷心無方便者。

In the next section, it first cites the Vinaya. The perception of the object is the same as the precept against unchastity. In the notes, the first sentence shows the Vinaya text, and the next sentence clarifies the present explanation. This means that previously there was the preparatory stage of wishing to drink, and when it came to drinking later, thoughts or doubts arose that it was not liquor; the subsequent mind has no violation, but completes the prior preparatory stage, so a grave [offense] must be determined. If previously there was no intention and one was confused or forgot, an exception must be granted. The Commentary says: "The various masters determine the prohibition based on mind following object; my view is different. The holy prohibition has a reason, though the text is slightly incomplete. How could a wise person, having never smelled it, mistakenly drink it when needing syrup, and be assigned a pāyattika?" Daśādhyāya-vinaya: It considers not looking, which is the same as determining by the object now. Looking means lack of intention, which can prove that a confused mind has no preparatory stage.