Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1242

四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1242

Language
Classical Chinese

2.1242

釋中,初科,《四分》初明是酒。不論色香味草木作者,律云:梨汁酒、閻浮果酒、甘麁舍樓伽蒲萄酒等。若非下,明非酒。具三同酒,必不具者,如下甜酢,但犯吉羅。若酒下,明和食。準《注戒》,煮字下多酒字。上明犯重。若甜下,明結輕。律作甜味酒、錯味酒,今文合之。《十誦》。五種皆墮,並取能醉;《四分》結吉,應非醉者。𮡆即酒滓。食麴能醉,於義難顯,故引《多論》決之。論云:以麥及藥草,以酒和之,後乾持行,和水飲,令人醉也。

Under the explanation, in the first section, the Dharmaguptaka-vinaya first clarifies what is liquor. Regardless of color, smell, taste, or whether made of herbs or wood, the Vinaya says: pear juice liquor, jambu fruit liquor, sugarcane juice liquor, grape liquor, and so forth. From "if it is not" onward, it clarifies what is not liquor. Possessing the three, it is the same as liquor; if it does not possess them, as in the sweet or sour below, it only incurs a duṣkṛta. From "if liquor" onward, it clarifies mixing with food. According to the Annotated Precepts, the word "liquor" is added below the word "cooked." The above clarifies grave violations. From "if sweet" onward, it clarifies determining minor offenses. The Vinaya writes "sweet-tasting liquor, sour-tasting liquor"; the present text combines them. Daśādhyāya-vinaya: all five kinds are pāyattika, all taking intoxication as the criterion; the Dharmaguptaka determines them as duṣkṛta, presumably because they do not intoxicate. "Lees" (𮡆) means liquor sediment. Eating ferment can intoxicate, but its meaning is difficult to explain clearly, so the Sarvāstivāda Vinaya Vibhāṣā is cited to resolve it. The treatise says: Using barley and medicinal herbs, mixing them with liquor, then drying them and carrying them on journeys; mixing them with water to drink causes people to become drunk.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (1)