四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1510

2.1510

次約行中，初科，前明二持。上約四心，揀去三心。下約三性，揀去二性，以行心通三性故。止作下，次明二犯。亦約四心三性，以揀行體，在文可分。注分善惡者，以行心語通，恐相濫故。三善同時，而不相離。三惡相別，其性相違；作犯多是貪瞋，止犯率由癡慢；一往大判，非不互兼。

Next, in "In Terms of Practice," the first heading: earlier, the two maintenances are explained. Above, in terms of the four minds, the three minds were set aside. Below, in terms of the three natures, the two natures are set aside, because the active mind extends across all three natures. From "Cessation and action..." onward, the two violations are explained next. They also use the four minds and three natures to delineate the essence of practice, which can be distinguished in the text. The note distinguishes wholesome and unwholesome because the term "active mind" is general, fearing they might be conflated. The three wholesome [roots] are simultaneous and not separated from one another. The three unwholesome [roots] are distinct from one another, their natures mutually conflicting; action-violation mostly consists of greed and hatred, while cessation-violation generally stems from delusion and arrogance; this is a general determination for the time being, not that they do not mutually overlap.