四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1577

2.1577

三中。引論唯簡邪正。人輕蟻重，且據業論，不約制教。準義，亦合約趣，道俗，持毀，凡聖簡之，文略不出所以；殺阿羅漢，出佛身血，皆在逆收，豈非重也。六足毘曇，《成論》自指；六足者，即論別目七論共為一部，後一《發智論》為身，餘六如足故也。（簡佛毘曇及《婆沙》，《雜心》等毘曇故。）

In the third: Citing the treatise only differentiates wrong from right. A human being light and an ant being heavy is provisionally stated in terms of karma, not prescriptive teaching. According to principle, it should also be differentiated by destinies, monastics and laity, maintaining and violating, and ordinary beings and nobles; the text is brief and does not provide the reasons. Killing an arhat and shedding the Buddha's blood are both included under deadly sins; how could they not be heavy? The Six-Pāda Abhidharma is directly cited in the *Tattvasiddhi-śāstra*; the 'six pādas' are the specific titles of the treatise, seven treatises together forming one collection, with the last, the *Jñānaprasthāna*, as the body, and the remaining six being like its feet. (This differentiates it from the Buddha's Abhidharma, the *Mahāvibhāṣā*, the *Saṃyuktābhidharmahṛdaya*, and other Abhidharmas.)