四分律行事鈔資持記 2.182

2.182

次答中。作無作別者，動靜異故；心非心別者，體相違故。《業疏》三句：一作是色心，無作非色心；二作者初緣，無作後業；三作是運動，無作非故。（鈔無第二，餘二比對大同。）若下，釋疑。以不許立三，恐謂戒法唯局此二，故持釋之；顯上且據能防，故唯二也。

In the second answer: That action and non-action differ is because movement and stillness are different; that mind and non-mind differ is because their essences are contrary to each other. The Karma Commentary has three lines: first, action is matter and mind, while non-action is neither matter nor mind; second, action is the initial condition, while non-action is the subsequent karma; third, action is physical exertion, while non-action is not. (The Manual lacks the second, while the other two are largely identical upon comparison.) From "If..." downward, resolving doubts. Because establishing three is not permitted, fearing that one might think the precept dharmas are restricted solely to these two, it is therefore explained by maintaining [this distinction], revealing that the above is provisionally based on the capacity to guard against [transgression], hence there are only two.