四分律行事鈔資持記 2.283

2.283

犯相中，初科。以自造他逼，犯相有異；故列兩緣。前約趣境論緣，由本有心，故就身明犯；後約境合辨緣，既開身交，故就心明犯。初緣，先示犯相，次正列緣。裹隔者，用物裹根以隔之；律文，四句皆犯。一有隔有隔（彼此俱有。），二有隔無隔（此有彼無。），三無隔有隔（此無彼有。），四無隔無隔（彼此俱無。）；《善見》云：於女三道，或以樹葉、或衣、或熟皮等，隨得物而用隔也。第二緣，注云等者，即不犯中，一切無婬意、癡狂心亂等。

Under the marks of violation, the first section. Because there is a difference in the marks of violation between doing it oneself and being coerced by another, he lists two conditions. The former discusses conditions in terms of approaching the object; because there is originally intention, he clarifies the violation regarding the body. The latter analyzes conditions in terms of union with the object; since bodily intercourse is permitted, he clarifies the violation regarding the mind. In the first condition, he first shows the mark of violation, and next formally lists the conditions. 'Wrapping and separating' means using an object to wrap the organ in order to separate it; in the Vinaya text, all four alternatives constitute a violation: 1. with separation and with separation (both sides have it); 2. with separation and without separation (this side has it, that side does not); 3. without separation and with separation (this side does not, that side has it); 4. without separation and without separation (neither side has it). The Samantapāsādikā states: 'In the three paths of a woman, using either tree leaves, or clothing, or dressed leather, etc., one uses whatever object one obtains to separate them.' In the second condition, the note says 'and so on', which means among non-violations, all instances of lacking sexual intent, dementia, mental derangement, and so forth.