四分律行事鈔資持記 2.294

2.294

犯相中，初文。準疏但有五緣，無今第五。彼問云：今此盜緣無方便者？答：損財明盜，便成重罪；有盜成重罪，不假方便，恐涉濫故；縱有方便，亦俱不明；但知未離已前，並方便攝。今鈔不釋，意亦可見。總括犯緣，不出心境；一四即境，二三及五是心；六中兼二，心境合故。

In the marks of violation, the first text: according to the Commentary, there are only five conditions, lacking the present fifth. There it asks: "In these conditions for stealing here, why is there no preparatory stage?" The answer is: stealing is explained by causing loss of property, which at once becomes a grave offense; when stealing constitutes a grave offense, it does not rely on a preparatory stage, for fear of involving confusion; even if there were a preparatory stage, neither would be clear; one only needs to know that prior to not having departed [the place], it is entirely subsumed under the preparatory stage. Now the Transactions Manual does not explain it, and the intention can also be seen. Summarizing the conditions of violation, they do not go beyond mind and object: the first and fourth are the object; the second, third, and fifth are the mind; the sixth combines both, because mind and object unite.