四分律行事鈔資持記 2.300

2.300

引證中，初舉例證。文如後引。次引文證。言不問取者，即盜相也。知，即識法故違；不知，謂愚教迷犯。（古云：大乘約境判者，非也；此即愚癡波羅夷之類耳。）言犯蘭者，正望佛結；縱有主掌，經家不論；然罪名雖輕，據業則重。

In citing proof, first it adduces an example as proof, whose text is as cited below. Next it cites the text as proof. Saying "taking without asking" is the mark of stealing. "Knowing" means knowing the Dharma and intentionally transgressing; "not knowing" refers to being ignorant of the teaching and confusedly violating it. (Ancient teachers said: "The Mahāyāna determines it in terms of the object"; this is incorrect; this is merely of the kind of the pārājika of foolishness.) Saying "incurring a sthūlātyaya" directly concludes it with respect to the Buddha; even if there is an administrator, the compiler of the sūtra does not discuss it; however, although the name of the offense is light, based on karma it is grave.