四分律行事鈔資持記 2.333

2.333

四中。此似復示暫安之義，但文不相接。彼論，具問非佛屋，佛像在中，可在前食臥不？答：得食。若佛在世，猶於前食，況像不得；但臥須障，今止引臥文。彼不明罪相，今云不犯者，與佛同處本得小罪故。

In the fourth [section], this seems to reiterate the meaning of temporary placement, but the text is not directly contiguous. That treatise fully asks: If it is not a Buddha hall, but a Buddha image is inside, can one eat and sleep before it? The answer is: Eating is permitted. If when the Buddha was in the world one could still eat before him, how much more so before an image? However, for sleeping, a screen is required. The present text only cites the passage on sleeping. That treatise does not clarify the grade of offense; here it says 'no violation' because being in the same place as the Buddha originally incurred a minor offense.