四分律行事鈔資持記 2.349

2.349

義決中，初科，為二；前明不白定犯，初牒前論文。雖下，斷犯。雖打鐘者，恐謂在道作相無過故。以下，示犯所以。律下，例證。四種界中，食同法別，如結界所明。若為下，二明白已免過。下指所據，文如上引；準彼和僧減用之義，檢對可知。

Regarding the theoretical resolution: the first section has two parts. The former clarifies that failing to announce definitely incurs an offense; first it reiterates the text of the treatise. From "Although..." downward, it determines the offense. "Although the bell was struck" is stated for fear that one might think that making the arrangement on the road is without fault. From "Because..." downward, it shows the reason for the offense. From "The Vinaya..." downward, it adduces a corroborating parallel. Among the four kinds of boundaries, "food is shared while legal transactions are distinct," as explained under the determination of boundaries. From "If for the sake of..." downward, the second clarifies that having announced, one avoids fault. Below, it points to the authority relied upon, the text being as cited above; according to its principle of harmonizing the Saṃgha to reduce usage, one can verify and understand it by comparison.