四分律行事鈔資持記 2.367

2.367

次科，分二，初明別用。二位用別，在文可見。惡戒有德，須約四重持破以簡。時及非時，即據日中前後以論。非法用者，主掌過也。二種下，次指互用。準上，即當分互中；然前文止開四方互作十方，如減園果、賣房作食之類；若論十方，物非停久，即無互作四方之義。若約二位各論互者，如賣房治房，持重物與餘寺，此四方自互也。又如《四分》，法別食同，即十方自互也。然上三互，並須和僧則開，不和則閉，故云得不也。

The next section is divided into two. First, it clarifies separate usage. The separate usages of the two ranks are evident in the text. Bad precepts and virtuous ones must be distinguished according to whether the four pārājikas are maintained or broken. Proper time and improper time are discussed based on before and after midday. Improper usage is the administrator's fault. From "The two kinds..." downward, next, it indicates mutual usage. "According to the above" refers to interchanging within the proper category; however, the previous text only permitted interchanging four-directions property into ten-directions property, such as reducing orchards or selling rooms to make food; if discussing ten-directions property, since the property is not retained for long, there is no principle of interchanging it into four-directions property. If discussing interchange within each of the two ranks: such as selling rooms to repair rooms, or taking heavy property to give to another monastery, this is the four-directions interchanging within itself. Also, as in the Dharmaguptaka-vinaya, "legal transactions are distinct while food is shared," which is the ten-directions interchanging within itself. However, all three interchanges above must be permitted when harmonizing with the Saṃgha and barred when not, hence it says "whether permissible or not."