四分律行事鈔資持記 2.389

2.389

第二正明中，《十誦》二段，初明寄附；若借下，二明假借；初中，前明比丘受他寄物。則觀己心好惡，論償不償。促字，律本作投字，傳寫之誤。次明比丘以物寄俗。則觀他心謹慢，論索不索。若寄下，指例。初句，即居士受寄比丘物，例同前段償不償也。次句，即居士以物寄比丘，例同後段索不索也。二句同前，故指如上。假借中。既借他物，有損必償；恐濫寄附，故特標簡。

In the second, directly clarifying [the matter], the Daśādhyāya-vinaya has two sections. First, it clarifies entrusting for safekeeping; 'if borrowing,' and so forth, secondly clarifies borrowing. In the first part, it first clarifies a bhikṣu accepting an object entrusted by another; one then examines the goodness or malice of one's own mind to determine whether to compensate or not. The character 'urge' (cu) is written as 'cast' (tou) in the Vinaya text, which is an error in transcription. Next, it clarifies a bhikṣu entrusting an object to a layperson; one then examines the other's prudence or negligence to determine whether to demand it back or not. 'If entrusting,' and so forth, indicates the examples. The first clause is a householder receiving an object entrusted by a bhikṣu, which is analogous to the former section on compensating or not. The next clause is a householder entrusting an object to a bhikṣu, which is analogous to the latter section on demanding it back or not. The two clauses are identical to the preceding, hence it indicates 'as above'. In borrowing: since one borrows another's property, if there is damage one must compensate; fearing this might be confused with entrusting for safekeeping, it is specifically marked and distinguished.