四分律行事鈔資持記 2.426

2.426

定錢體中，初引論。答中，初二兩解，並限五錢；後解隨死，不局物數；初同《十誦》，二符本宗，三即論家所取。《戒疏》云：如《多論》中，盜相通濫；初釋本錢，何由可曉（此破初解）？後解隨國現斷入死，言亦泛濫，難可依承（此破第三解）。

Under determining the substance of the coins, the first part cites the treatise. In the answer, the first two explanations are both limited to five coins; the latter explanation follows [the penalty of] death and is not restricted to the number of goods. The first is identical to the Daśādhyāya-vinaya, the second accords with our own school, and the third is what the treatise master adopts. The Precept Commentary says: As in the Sarvāstivāda Vinaya Vibhāṣā, the marks of theft are broad and equivocal. In the first explanation of the original coins, by what means could they be understood? (This refutes the first explanation.) In the latter explanation, following whatever currently warrants execution in a country, the statement is also too vague and difficult to rely upon. (This refutes the third explanation.)