四分律行事鈔資持記 2.599

2.599

三中又三，初不受無犯者，無別長故。缺壞二罪，逐日隨結。若下，用長為受，上明加受失淨。無長防者，以淨本防長，今非長故。下明捨受重說。恐謂已淨，後不須故。又下，指擬非長。即入三衣數故。問：後用加持不？答：指但免長，不即加持。故知衣成別自加受。下約肘量者，則明量外非法服限。文舉一衣，餘二類準。褻本音薛，字當作褻，音㲲，即布帛也。

In the third, there are also three parts: First, not receiving [extra robes] incurs no offense, because there is no distinct extra. The two offenses of missing and damaging are incurred progressively day by day. From 'if' downwards, using extra robes for formal determination: the upper part clarifies that formal determination nullifies the pure relinquishment. 'Having no protection against extra' is because pure relinquishment originally protects against extra robes, and now they are no longer extra. The lower part clarifies that relinquishing the formal determination requires repeating the formula, for fear that one might think it was already purified and thus not needed afterwards. From 'further' downwards, designating [a robe] makes it not an extra robe, because it enters the number of the three robes. Question: Does one later use adhiṣṭhāna or not? Answer: Designating only exempts it from being an extra robe; it is not immediate adhiṣṭhāna. Therefore we know that once the robe is completed, one separately performs adhiṣṭhāna. Below, with respect to the cubit measure, it clarifies the limit of non-dharma robes outside the measure. The text mentions one robe; the other two follow by analogy. 'Xiè' (褻) originally had the sound xiè; the character should be 'xiè' (褻), pronounced dié, which means cloth or silk.