四分律行事鈔資持記 2.617

2.617

三中，初文。四緣開者，前據虛想，此約實失，故注以簡之。問：若實奪失，何容後得耶？答：奪失水漂，皆可再獲；燒有餘殘，義亦無爽。注文末句，因點受持；由奪等緣，失本受法；後得重加，義在離衣，緣同因示。

In the third, the first text: the exception based on the four conditions: the preceding was based on false conceptions, whereas this concerns actual loss, which the notes differentiate. Question: If it was actually robbed or lost, how could one obtain it later? Answer: Robbery, loss, or being swept away by water can all be recovered again; in burning, there may be remnants left behind, so the meaning is also without flaw. The final sentence of the notes takes the opportunity to point out formal determination (adhiṣṭhāna): due to conditions such as robbery, one loses the original determining dharma; when obtained later, one must redetermine it. The meaning lies in being separated from the robe; because the conditions are identical, it is pointed out incidentally.