四分律行事鈔資持記 2.675

2.675

不已中，初明五想。壞想者，謂故爛等。注中初釋不犯。決下二句，釋失受意。無下二句，釋無罪意。次引《善見》和會相違，初句指論。即前道行界文；師下，出論意。但疑在外，隔明失法，不慮失體故。此下，出今律意，異上可知。若下，次列諸緣。並是難開。此下，總斷。五想賊獸等是情礙，水陸道斷是隔礙。

Under "Not Ceasing": first it explains the five perceptions. "Perception of damage" refers to old decay and so forth. In the note, it first explains non-offense. The two lines below "resolving" explain the intention behind losing the reception [status]. The two lines below "without" explain the intention behind non-offense. Next, quoting the Samantapāsādikā to reconcile contradictions: the first line points to the treatise. That is the previous text on traveling-boundary. "The master..." below brings out the treatise's intention. Merely suspecting it is outside, the passage of dawn causes loss of the ritual, without concern for losing the physical object. "This..." below brings out the intention of the present Vinaya, whose difference from the above is evident. "If..." below next lists the various causes. All are exceptions due to hardship. "This..." below judges collectively: the five perceptions, bandits, beasts, and so on are subjective obstructions (citta-pratibandha); the severance of water and land routes are spatial obstructions.