四分律行事鈔資持記 2.738

2.738

犯輕中，《多論》五節，初明自作。無蠶家者，展轉來故。言無罪者，以無蟲故。若是有蟲，出賣尚犯，豈容自作。為下，二明出賣。不為作衣，故彼續云：若無蟲者無罪。若乞下，三明已成。而不犯者，非蠶家故。若蟲下，四明蟲壞。無所損故。論作蠶壞，恐寫誤。作下，五作餘衣。竝結吉者，必約蠶家乞得為言。彼云：下至四肘捨墮，反知不應者輕。又云：若合麻衣劫貝褐衣欽婆羅作敷具者吉，故云一切。

Under minor offenses: The *Sarvāstivāda Vinaya Vibhāṣā* has five sections. First, it explains making it oneself. "Without a silkworm household" means it came via transfer. Saying "no offense" is because there are no worms. If there are worms, even selling it incurs an offense, how could making it oneself be allowed? From "For" below, second, it clarifies selling it. Not making garments for oneself; thus it continues there: "If there are no worms, there is no offense." From "If begged" below, third, it clarifies already made. Not offending is because it is not a silkworm household. From "If worms" below, fourth, it clarifies ruined by worms. Because there is no harm done. The treatise has "ruined by silkworms", which is feared to be a scribal error. From "Making" below, fifth, making other garments. Both incurring duṣkṛta must be spoken of with respect to begging from silkworm households. It says there: "Down to four cubits, forfeiture and pāyattika"; by contrast, one knows that what is inappropriate is minor. It also says: "If combined with hemp garments, karpāsa, coarse wool garments, or kambala to make a spreading-cloth, it is a duṣkṛta"; hence it says "all".