四分律行事鈔資持記 2.805

2.805

次作淨中，《四分》。即已犯財對俗捨文。準疏分四節，初句牒前制過。告下，二明捨錢方便。覓淨主付也。若彼下，三謂不達施意。佛為淨故，令彼受之；彼不解故，不敢即受，乖淨施法。當為彼物受者，既捨與彼，即屬彼故。若為貿衣須易受者，以先淨法不成故。若彼下，四此約解意。即取迴淨，不須轉易。若下，別明淨語。疏云：看是謂看於錢寶；知是，謂非我所作，為淨與爾，何得不道，失法故吉。

Next, in [the section on] performing purification, the *Dharmaguptaka-vinaya* contains the text on forfeiting property already violated in the presence of a layperson. According to the commentary, it is divided into four sections: the first sentence refers back to the previously prohibited fault. Second, from 'Telling' down, it clarifies the expedient means of forfeiting the money, which is to seek out a pure owner and hand it over. Third, from 'If that' down, it refers to failing to understand the intention of giving: because the Buddha required purification, he ordered him to receive it; because he does not understand, he does not dare to receive it immediately, which contravenes the method of pure giving. 'One should receive it on behalf of that article' means that since it has already been forfeited to him, it now belongs to him. 'If to trade for robes one must change what is received' is because the previous purification procedure did not succeed. Fourth, from 'If that' down, this concerns understanding the intention: one takes it directly and returns it for purification, without needing to convert it. Next, from 'If' down, it specifically clarifies the words of purification. The commentary states: 'Look at this' means looking at the money and treasure; 'know this' means 'it is not mine; I give it to you for purification—how can you not say so?' Failing to perform the procedure incurs a duṣkṛta.