四分律行事鈔資持記 3.178

3.178

引文中，初科，前明須法。古謂不須羯磨，如疏斥之。未分便行者，即同安居人先出界去。言成分者，由身出界，不妨作法故。又下，次明心念受者，應云此是我物，三說。若時下，次明時定。律因舊住時中不分，意令客去人少物多。佛罰之者，以非時人多，得物反少，故知此施必在時中。既轉同非時，則須羯磨，義復明矣。

In citing the text, the first section: the former part clarifies the need for a ritual method. Ancients claimed that no karmavācanā was needed, which the Commentary refutes. "Departing before it is divided" refers to someone who observed the rains retreat together leaving the boundary first. The statement that the share is accomplished means that although the body has left the boundary, it does not obstruct carrying out the ritual method. "Moreover below" next explains mental reception: one should say, "This is my property," three times. "If timely below" next clarifies the determination of the time. In the Vinaya, because permanent residents did not divide it during the time, intending that the guests would leave so there would be few people and many items, the Buddha penalized them: because there were many people during the non-timely period, the items obtained were conversely few. Thus we know this gift must occur within the timely period. Since it then transformed into being treated like non-timely, it required a karmavācanā, and the meaning is clear once again.