四分律行事鈔資持記 3.310

3.310

同界集中，初明持出別受。準似界外受之，但犯越者，即成分衣，但乖法故。注引《四分》例決不成，即盜僧物。若下，次明羯磨限約。在前入界，作法重分；已後入者，不須與分。下引律證。可知。

In assembling in the same boundary: first, it clarifies carrying them outside to receive them separately. It seems like receiving them outside the boundary, but merely committing a transgressive act [means] dividing robes is accomplished, only that it deviates from the rule. The note cites the Four-Part Vinaya to determine by analogy that it is not accomplished, which constitutes stealing the Saṃgha's property. From 'If' onward, it next clarifies the limit set by the karmavācanā. Entering the boundary beforehand, one performs the procedure to re-divide; for those entering afterward, one does not need to divide and give to them. Below, it cites the Vinaya as proof. It can be known.