四分律行事鈔資持記 3.633

3.633

四中。《五分》受請犯吉，旦約乞食為言；餘之十一，例皆違犯。準《解脫道論》。糞掃衣，受居士施衣即失；但三衣，畜長衣即失；乞食，受請即失（如上）；不作餘食法，作則名失；一摶食，再食則失（此二論無，準義明之。）；蘭若，聚落住即失；塚間，餘勝處坐即失；樹下，屋舍住即失；露地，覆處即失；隨坐，貪樂處坐即失；常坐，寢臥即失；不捨而違，例皆犯吉。不能令捨者，應云：我從今日捨乞食等。則知此十二行，竝須作法受行；不能，須捨；不受，不成；不捨，違犯知之。

In the fourth: In the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya, accepting an invitation constitutes a duṣkṛta offense, which is spoken for the moment regarding begging for food; the other eleven are likewise violations. According to the Vimuttimagga: For rag robes, receiving robes given by householders is immediate loss; for having only three robes, storing extra robes is immediate loss; for begging for food, accepting an invitation is immediate loss (as above); not having the ritual of leftover food, if one does perform it, it is termed a loss; for eating in a single sitting, eating again is a loss (these two are absent in the treatise, but explained according to the principle); for the araṇya, dwelling in a settlement is immediate loss; for charnel grounds, sitting in other, superior places is immediate loss; for under trees, dwelling in houses is immediate loss; for the open air, covered places are immediate loss; for sitting wherever one finds oneself, sitting in places of attachment and delight is immediate loss; for always sitting, lying down to sleep is immediate loss; violating them without relinquishing them uniformly constitutes a duṣkṛta. For one unable to maintain them and wishing to relinquish, one should say: "From this day forward, I relinquish begging for food," and so forth. Thus it is known that these twelve practices must all be received and practiced by formal karmavācanā; if unable, one must relinquish them; if not received, they are not accomplished; if not relinquished, one should know that violating them constitutes an offense.