四分律行事鈔資持記 1.714

1.714

In the second, the counterpart [conditions], concerning delimiting the boundary, the first section has two parts: first, clarifying the rationale for requiring a boundary. From "Therefore" downward, it admonishes that one must investigate thoroughly. There are then two aspects: first, clarifying the marks of the boundary, so as to know the limits of the assembly; second, comprehending what is right and wrong, so as to examine the underlying execution of the transaction. If it is not so, then it is contrary to the above two, either because the demarcating marks lack standard, or because the previous delimitation was improper; if there is the slightest suspicion or disorder, it must be delimited again. The Commentary states: "Abolishing and delimiting [a boundary] is extremely easy; how could one make light of it?"