四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1133

2.1133

The enumerated conditions may be known. If the other receives the food, with each swallow both incur a pāyattika. Question: Since there was already the earlier prohibition, in principle one ought not to violate it; moreover, the leftover rite was permitted, so one could simply perform it accordingly; why, then, upon receiving an urge, was this precept instituted anew? Answer: Originally, the other harbored resentment and intended to cause him to commit an offense; he cleverly contrived artful words to mislead him without his realizing it. When it comes to constituting an offense, they must occur at the same time; yet the one urged violates the earlier rule, while the one urging violates the latter rule. In the Vinaya, if the other discards it, gives it to someone else, or performs the leftover rite himself, then the one urging commits only a duṣkṛta.