四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1204

2.1204

In the doctrinal resolution: because the text prohibits it for those sharing the benefit, it is based on multiple persons and does not clarify a solitary invitation. Therefore, based on the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya, one is ordered to announce it to the inviting family, and so forth. "One" should properly be "with" (以); or perhaps above "come" two characters are missing, which match the two announcements above. From "that" onwards, it cites proof. "Constant invitation" means unending perpetual offerings. "Mutual visiting" means I go to their house, and they come to this house.