四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1379

2.1379

The *Satyasiddhi-śāstra*. To refute the positions of others, it first presents it as a question. In the answer there are two meanings: first, it clarifies that it has no owner. Anāthapiṇḍada's taking it is cited by the treatise itself as proof. He had attained the second fruit, hence he is called a noble one; since a noble one took it, it can be verified that there is no offense. Below, 'furthermore...', it next demonstrates that it is not theft. This is cited to clarify that on the grounds of a monastery (saṅghārāma), one may take hidden treasure.