四分律行事鈔資持記 2.732

2.732

Under the various schools: In the first section, the *Sarvāstivāda Vinaya Vibhāṣā* has four parts. The first indicates the name. That school's prātimokṣa says: "Making teaching-utensils (jiaoju) with kauśeya"; hence the treatise takes it up. The treatise lost its translator's name, but it should have been translated under the Qin; thus it says "the land of Qin". From "If" below, it reveals the offense. From "The word" below, it rectifies the name. The interlinear commentary states the original intention of translation. The ancients considered the precept to forbid bedspreads, merely because they were confused about the name, as the Commentary broadly refutes. From "External" below, it shows the method for floss garments. "Also permitted to make" is because they came via transfer. "Offense if obtained by begging" is because excessive craving was prohibited.