金剛般若論會釋 1.26

1.26

於中若說言下，指經文配，有二復次，釋福聚及佛法二文，即福聚、佛法俱是第四住處欲得法身，第三欲得福相法身文。解佛法中有二復次，解初復次中有三，初、配經增損，次、解不共相應義，後、指通配不共者，不與相應義，謂妄所執佛所說不與相應，相應者相契當故，所說契理故。解不共相應中，初、標二，後、重解。重解中但解相應，所不相應即是不共。以雖不說亦自知故者，謂依真諦，妄計所執不共之法，佛雖不說以為真道般若之體令人修學，佛亦自知為無，故無自性。今就世諦說名佛法，由離二邊境，斷除法執故，能斷對治，無分別道。

Below "if one says herein," pointing to the sūtra text to correlate, there are two restatements explaining the two texts on the accumulation of merit and the Buddha-dharmas, which mean that both the accumulation of merit and the Buddha-dharmas belong to the fourth abode, desiring to attain the dharmakāya, and the third, desiring to attain the dharmakāya of merit and marks. In explaining the Buddha-dharmas there are two restatements. In explaining the first restatement there are three: first, correlating with the sūtra's superimposition and deprecation; next, explaining the meaning of non-shared conformity; finally, pointing out general correlation. "Non-shared" means not conforming to, meaning that what is falsely grasped does not conform to what the Buddha taught; "conforming" means corresponding, because what is taught accords with reality. In explaining non-shared conformity, first there is the setting forth of the two, and then a re-explanation. In the re-explanation it only explains conformity; what does not conform is non-shared. "Because although not taught, it is also known by oneself" means: based on ultimate truth, regarding the non-shared phenomena falsely conceived and grasped, although the Buddha does not teach them as the essence of the true path and prajñā for people to cultivate and learn, the Buddha also knows by himself that they do not exist and thus lack intrinsic nature. Now, speaking in terms of conventional truth, they are called Buddha-dharmas; because of departing from the realms of the two extremes and severing attachment to phenomena, they can sever remedies and the non-conceptual path.