金剛般若論會釋 3.55

3.55

次下破名身見分非有，經文可知，論文有二，初、牒經屬義，指同前說；次、明世界唯屬有情，但名身也。今觀名身界空故，言世界即非。

Next below, refuting that the subjective aspect of the name-body is non-existent: the sūtra text can be understood. In the text of the treatise there are two parts: first, citing the sūtra to attribute its meaning, indicating it is identical to what was previously said; next, clarifying that the world belongs solely to sentient beings and is merely the name-body. Now, contemplating that the realm of the name-body is empty, it says that the world is precisely not [a world].