俱舍論記 1.150

1.150

「論曰至謂此餘心」者，以三性心望善、惡、無表，明亂不亂。若異性相望名亂，以異性故；若同性相望名不亂，以同性故。謂此善無表，餘不善無記名為亂心，即以自善心名不亂。謂此不善無表，餘善、無記名為亂心，即以自不善心名不亂。是即善、不善心通亂、不亂，無記唯名亂，自無無表故。若依《正理》，不善、無記名亂心，善心名不亂。釋稍不同。

Regarding "The commentary states: […] it refers to minds other than this": In relation to wholesome and unwholesome non-informative [matter], minds of the three natures are examined to clarify "distracted" and "undistracted". If examined with respect to a different nature, it is called "distracted", because of the different nature; if examined with respect to the same nature, it is called "undistracted", because of the same nature. That is to say, for this wholesome non-informative [matter], other unwholesome and indeterminate minds are called "distracted mind", and its own wholesome mind is called "undistracted". For this unwholesome non-informative [matter], other wholesome and indeterminate minds are called "distracted mind", and its own unwholesome mind is called "undistracted". Thus, wholesome and unwholesome minds encompass both distracted and undistracted, whereas indeterminate [mind] is called solely distracted, because it has no non-informative [matter] of its own. According to the *Nyāyānusāra*, unwholesome and indeterminate [minds] are called distracted mind, while wholesome mind is called undistracted. The explanation is slightly different.